1 Canada is one of the world’s largest oil producers, yet some provinces still rely on imported oil. Recently, several provincial leaders are pushing to build a cross-country pipeline, arguing that it could help increase energy independence and diversify trade partners. Do you support building one?
2 Which of the following statements best reflects your view on Canada’s energy market and its reliance on imports? Totals may exceed 100% due to multiple answer choices Canada should use its own oil | |
Imports make sense if they’re cheaper | |
We need pipelines to solve this | |
Energy independence isn’t realistic | |
A mix of domestic and imported is best | |
It’s more about politics than oil | |
Canada needs more diverse energy options | |
3 Currently, Canada exports 97% of its crude oil to the U.S. Some say this makes us vulnerable to tariffs, while others see the U.S. as a reliable partner. Do you agree that Canada should diversify its energy trade market?
Cancel or pause whenever you want
For first-time subscribers only 4 Quebec Premier François Legault recently reaffirmed his opposition to a cross-country pipeline project, citing a lack of “social acceptability” in his province. Yet, a public survey shows over 60% of Quebecers support the project. What do you think are the main reasons for Quebec’s opposition? Totals may exceed 100% due to multiple answer choices Quebecers oppose national projects crossing their borders | |
It’s about provincial autonomy | |
Environmental concerns matter most | |
It’s a negotiation tactic | |
Political strategy—appeasing local voters | |
5 In your view, how likely is Quebec to collaborate on a cross-country pipeline in the near future?
6 Gas prices go up and down, influenced by factors like fuel imports and transportation costs. Do you think more pipelines would lower gas prices? Yes, more supply means lower prices | |
No, prices are controlled globally | |
7 Do you think the federal government should make the building of a cross-Canada pipeline a high priority?
8 How would you rate the Canadian media’s coverage of the cross-Canada pipeline debate? Excellent: fair, thorough, and well-balanced | |
Good: informative but lacks deeper analysis of underlying issues | |
Average: provides basic details, but misses critical context | |
Poor: sensationalized, biased, or overlooks important facts | |
| 
